R. v. Illes, [2008] first degree murder; Trial judge charging jury that law presumes any incriminating part of accused’s statement likely true, while exculpatory statements carry less weight — Whether direction improper SUPREME COURT OF CANADA     Citation: R. v. Illes, [2008] 3 S.C.R. 134, 2008 SCC 57

More Articles... WIC Radio Ltd. v. Simpson, [2008] radio talk show host; opposing social activist; Defamation; re. introducing materials dealing with homosexuality into public schools; M compared S in her public persona to Hitler R. v. Stirling, [2008] criminal negligence causing death;prior consistent statements admitted into evidence to rebut allegation of recent fabrication — Whether trial judge used statements for truth of their contents and to support credibility of witness. R. v. Wittwer, [2008] three counts of sexual interference; The impugned statement should have been excluded pursuant to s. 24(2) of the Canadian Charter R. v. Rojas, [2008] charge to jury; M said that he bought some gas to have the car burned. M testified that he did not know that the victim’s body was inside the car. RBC Dominion Securities Inc. v. Merrill Lynch Canada Inc., [2008] virtually all the investment advisors at that branch left without notice for the branch of its competitor, Merrill Lynch Juman v. Doucette, [2008] childcare worker, provided day-care services in her home. A 16?month?old child suffered a seizure while in her care; She relied on the parties’ implied undertaking to the court not to use documents or answers on discovery F.H. v. McDougall, [2008) Sechelt Indian Residential School; M was an Oblate Brother at the school; H claimed to have been sexually assaulted by M R. v. Pritchard, [2008] marijuana stash; on circumstantial evidence, the accused was charged with murdering S during the course of the robbery.

<< Start < Prev 1 2 Next > End >>

Page 1 of 2